วันอังคารที่ 28 สิงหาคม พ.ศ. 2550

ICT Blocks youtube.com!

4th April, 2007
YouTube blocked because of clip 'offensive to monarchy'

Internet users in Thailand have been denied access to one of the world's most popular websites following claims it contained material offensive to the monarchy.

Local Web surfers can no longer access the YouTube site. The Information and Communications Technology (ICT) Ministry said it had blocked the site because it contained a film clip deemed offensive to the monarchy.

The ministry was forced to block access to the entire site after failing to restrict just the alleged item.

YouTube lets users across the world post their

own videos or films. It has become one of the

Web's most popular sites.

ICT Minister Sitthichai Pookaiyaudom said the government had approached the site owner, Google. However, the company said it had no policy about content deemed offensive in this country.

Sitthichai said Thailand considered the matter important and felt compelled to bar the site.

Access will be resumed when the allegedly offensive item is withdrawn.

He said jurisdictional and other legal complexities hindered legal action against the site and the content provider.

CAT Telecom executive Kitisak Sriprasert said it responded immediately after the ministry asked it to block access to YouTube.

The move was a short-term solution, he said.

วันจันทร์ที่ 27 สิงหาคม พ.ศ. 2550

TOT is at risk of collapse

State Telco firm 'needs new execs to survive'

Komsan Tortermvasana
Wichit Chantanusornsiri

Informations and Communications Technology Minister Sittichai Pookaiyaudom said the trouble-plagued TOT Plc was on the verge of collapse and needed to find a worthy board of directors and president if it was to survive.

The minister blamed internal conflicts by parties who exploited the state agency for their own benefits for the severe problems facing the organisation.

Mr. Sitthichai's statement came as conflicts at TOT made headlines this week with the agency's union calling on the board to resign.
The minister said TOT's revenue was plunging but its expenses remained unchanged. If the revenue-sharing it is receiving from concessionaires is excluded, TOT would already be in the red, he said.
According to the minister, TOT has to pay out 20 billion baht annually for staff salaries but is losing around 20 billion baht due to withheld access charges from mobile phone operators.
The mobile operators DTAC and True since last November, arguing that TOT should adopt the interconnection fee system approved by the National Telecommunications Commission. TOT charges access fees to telecom concessionaires of CAT Telecom Plc for accessing its network.
An arbitration committee has also ordered TOT to pay an access charge share of nine billion baht to True Corp, its fixed-line concessionaire. TOT has appealed against the ruling but if it loses, it may have to pay a total of 14 billion baht including interest.
TOT used to be an important business unit of the Finance Ministry, but that has all changed with the dwindling number of fixed-line clients and TOT's inability to compete with private operators for broadband internet services.
Mr. Sitthichai described TOT as being "cursed", saying the organisation has been exploited by vested interests represented by certain TOT board members for a long time, which had caused untold internal rifts.
Mr. Sitthichai received a request this week from Nukol Bavornsirinukoon, deputy president of the TOT union, who demanded a reshuffle of the board.
The union representative also demanded Gen Saprang Kalayanamitr resign as TOT chairman.
However, the minister said he did cause the board would complete its term in four month's time.
Deputy Finance Minister Sommai Phasi said Mr. Sitthichai phoned him and discussed the problems at TOT and the necessity to find quick solutions.
As the Finance Ministry is the major shareholder of TOT, Mr. Sommai said he would discuss possible solutions to the persistent problems next week.
The TOT board met for eight hours yesterday to discuss the alleged problems. The board confirmed its resolution on Aug 17 to dismiss TOT president Somkhuan Boonminhent for cutting a fine on Alcatel-Lucent Co from 177 million baht to 52 million baht for its delayed completion of TOT's transmission network expansion project, or T-NEP, worth 1.78 billion baht.
The TOT board sidelined Mr. Somkhuan in May to oversee academic affairs for allegations of corruption in TOT's failing cellular venture Thai Mobile.
Mr. Somkhuan later sought protection from the Administrative Court. However, the TOT board has insisted on his dismissal, saying the decision was based on the T-NEP issue, not on Thai Mobile.
Gen Saprang insisted yesterday that he would not bow to calls for his resignation as TOT chairman. Only the prime minister and the chairman of the Council for National Security were in a position.

FreeBSD books

Wide range of varieties of books introducting the good Unix-Linux based platform Operating system. Topics in the books:

Chapter 1: Program Installation
1. FAMP (FreeBSD Apache MySQL PHP) packages, and its Installations:

Introducing the FreeBSD 5.4 installation on bootable CD by beginning the Standard installation of which selection of new partition is needed on current harddisk. It is recommended to do the fdisk before partitioning.

Important steps during installation is to choose the distribution that needs to be installed. The Custom menu is to be chosen with campat4x and src options, with the space bar tap to select as options.

In the books details on the step of choosing important options for optimum FreeBSD Kernel installation.

2. Apache Web Server installation: http://bsd.psru.ac.th/book2/famp/apache2_php5_mysql4_bsd-5.4.tar.gz
From FreeBSD using fetch commange to d/l the program for installation.

3. PHP Installation
4. Zend Optimizer Installation for increase the speed of PHP

Chapter 2: Mambo
http://www.mamboserver.com
Chapter 3: Moodle
http://www.moodle.org
Chapter 4: PostNuke
http://www.postnuke.com
Chapter 5: PHPNuke
www #fetch http://bsd.psru.ac.th/book2/phpnuke/unzip552.tar.gz

http://www.thaibsd.com

Chapter 6: ATutor
้้้้
http://www.atutor.ca

Chapter 7: Xoops
http://www.xoops.org

Chapter 8: oSCommerce
www #fetch http://bsd.psru.ac.th/book2/oscommerce/oscommerce-2.2ms2.tar.gz

Chapter 9: MediaWiki
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki

www #fetch http://bsd.psru.ac.th/book2/wikipedia/mediawiki-1.4.9.tar.gz

Chapter 10: phpMyAdmin
http://www.phpmyadmin.net/

www #fetch http://bsd.psru.ac.th/book2/phpmyadmin/phpMyAdmin-2.6.4.tar.gz

Chapter 11: PHProjekt
http://www.phprojekt.com/index.php

www #fetch http://bsd.psru.ac.th/book2/phprojekt/phprojekt.tar.gz

Chapter 12: PHPSysinfo
http://sourceforge.net/proojects/phpsysinfo/

www #fetch http://bsd.psru.ac.th/book2/phpsysinfo/phpsysinfo-2.3.tar.gz

Chapter 13: AWStats
http://www.awstats.org

Chapter 14: WebAlizer

etc...

วันอังคารที่ 21 สิงหาคม พ.ศ. 2550

News Briefs for August 20, 2007



WirelessWeek - August 20, 2007

The first known pirated copy of "The Simpsons Movie" to make it onto the Internet was tracked to a 21-year-old Australian man, who will be formally charged in October. Police said the man recorded the movie using his cell phone on July 26 and that it had been uploaded to video-sharing sites based in the United States before the movie opened in theaters here. Reports claim the movie had been downloaded more than 110,000 times within 72 hours of being uploaded.

Excendia, a developer of speech-enabled unified communications solutions, announced the availability of Excendia Virtual Assistant on IBM WebSphere Voice Server. The solution provides mobile workers with hands-free, eyes-free access to their business information and office communications tools from any telephone as if they were sitting at their desk. Using speech commands over any telephone, users of the solution can access and manage their phone calls, e-mails, appointments and contacts. Excendia uses the IBM WebSphere speech recognition and text-to-speech technologies to understand user voice commands and deliver text content over the phone.

LGC, a telecommunications services company, announced that after a successful introduction in the European market, it is now launching its Mani Minutes service in the United States and Canada. This service will make the 4-Cents-Overseas-Calls available to everyone who has a cell phone. Mani Minutes offers users, free of charge, a set of U.S.-based numbers that they can permanently assign to their international contacts. Manifone will charge a small per minute fee, which to most destinations would be 4-6 cents a minute.

Telecom Italia Enters Dutch Broadband Market

Telecom Italia (News - Alert), Italy’s leading provider of advanced telecommunications is further expanding and pushing its agenda of services by launching Alice, its mobile subsidiary in Dutch broadband market.

The Dutch broadband market has been among the strongest in the world with a clutch of operators focusing on this most challenging place. With a much improved infrastructure, and ambitious plan by the government, broadband services can bring out a stable business for the players in this market. Broadband penetration here has been improving day by day and the government is planning to take this further to become the broadband market leaders in Europe by 2010.


A leading player in Europe through its Broadband Project, Telecom Italia has its business portfolios extended to fixed-line and mobile telecommunications, Internet, media, and in-office and systems solutions. Its subsidiary, Alice, offers high-speed Internet, VoIP, advanced messaging services, integrated fixed-line/mobile connectivity, Internet TV (IPTV), and the latest dual and triple play bundles (voice, Internet, TV).
Telecom Italia along with its Dutch subsidiary BBned have joined hands to launch broadband service. The Internet connection service will cost 30 euros a month with a speed of 20 Mbps and will guarantee broadband access and unlimited fixed line calls.
The 30 Euros broadband plan also offers a telephony subscription which provides free unlimited fixed line calls in the Netherlands and without any initial set up costs. Subscribers can also opt for flat-rate plan which will cost EUR 19.90 per month that offers calls to 47 international destinations (a limit of 500 minutes is applicable to some countries). The plan does not charge any installation costs and offers the modem free of charge.
Excited and positive about the entry of Alice in the Dutch market, Alice manager Arthur van den Ende said, “Customers are annoyed by service interruptions and slow connections while stuck in long-term contracts. In Italy, Germany and France, Alice has a combined customer base of about 10 million”.

AT&T debuts new TV service in Sacramento region

AT&T started offering its U-verse television service over phone lines Monday in Greater Sacramento, the 25th market to launch the pay video service.

The telecommunications giant joins Comcast, SureWest Communications, DirecTV and Dish Network in the lineup of companies offering video services to local customers in the region.

U-verse will be available in parts of Sacramento County and select areas of the cities of Sacramento, Carmichael, Fair Oaks, Folsom, Gold River, Rancho Cordova, Lincoln, Rocklin, Stockton and Modesto.

AT&T's service is made possible by the company's fiber-optic network. The video service runs over fiber-optic cables that link to neighborhood "nodes" that are installed an average of 3,000 feet from homes. From the nodes, the TV programming runs over traditional copper phone lines.

AT&T officials declined to say just how many homes have access to U-verse, citing competitive reasons.

On average in U-verse markets, about 30 percent of homes are eligible to receive the service, said Loretta Walker, AT&T vice president and general manager for the Sacramento area.

"U-verse is a game-changer for TV," Walker said, adding that AT&T now has 51,000 U-verse customers nationwide.

About 4 million homes are eligible nationwide to receive the service. That's expected to double later this year to 8 million eligible homes, Walker said.

AT&T plans to continue to increase U-verse availability throughout the are.

U-verse offers customers a combination of digital TV, including access to 26 high-definition channels, and high-speed Internet. AT&T is offering a variety of TV packages with more than 320 channels to choose from.

Most programming packages include up to three HD-capable receivers, including one with a digital video recorder that allows customers to pause, rewind and record live TV, at no extra charge. The DVR is capable of recording up to four programs at once. Most DVRs, by contrast, can record two shows at the same time.

U-verse TV offers start at $44 a month, and the lowest-price bundled service includes broadband Internet and 60 channels for $59 a month. The most expensive bundled service includes Internet download speeds of 6 megabits per second and 309 channels for $129 a month. The highest-priced package includes 34 digital music channels.

Seacom targets ‘aggressive' broadband prices

BY PAUL VECCHIATTO , ITWEB CAPE TOWN CORRESPONDENT

[ Cape Town | ITWeb, 6 August 2007 ] - East coast cable company Seacom will charge 80% less for bandwidth compared to Telkom, it says.

This, if realised, could knock the socks of SA's incumbent telecommunications operator and government-sponsored rival Infraco.

Seacom, a privately-financed venture, is surveying the planned route for its cable that should connect all countries on the East African seaboard to Sicily, in Europe, and India to the international telecommunications grid. It says its cable will have an initial capacity of 1.28Tb, four times as much as planned for rival Eassy (East African Submarine Cable System).

Working out the exact comparative pricing proposed by Seacom, with potential rivals such as Telkom and Infraco, is difficult because all players keep this a closely guarded secret. However, Seacom representatives have been canvassing local Internet and telecommunications providers to gauge their reaction.


Connectivity pricing

According to an industry source who has attended one of these briefings, Seacom is offering connectivity from Johannesburg to Sicily on the basis of an indefeasible right of use (IRU) – the exclusive right reserved for a client. It also offers a lease for STM-1, the standard telecommunications unit for a 155Mbps chunk of bandwidth – rising to STM-4, through to STM-64, amounting to 10Gbps.

“If a client takes the equivalent of STM-64 on an IRU that is based on 20 years of ownership, this works out at R475 per megabit per month,” the source says.

Telkom's equivalent fee is about R100 000 per megabit per month, but the source cautions this is not an exact comparison.

“Whatever the rate, it seems as though Seacom will be pegging itself far lower than Telkom and even that of Infraco, which has so far indicated it will be only 20% cheaper than Telkom. This should knock socks off,” the source says.

Seacom has admitted it is looking to supply bandwidth at 80% cheaper than prevailing market rates and says: “The Seacom [investors] believe there is a large amount of pent-up demand in the market. They expect a fundamental shift in how international bandwidth is procured and expect that the actual volumes will be substantial enough to encourage and support a low and declining bandwidth price.”

Government's solution

Industry and government have become increasingly critical of the high bandwidth costs associated with doing business in SA. This is the major reason given by the Department of Public Enterprises for the creation of Infraco, which will become a broadband wholesaler to rival Telkom. Hearings into the law that will govern Infraco are under way in Parliament.

The department's rationale is that the situation is the result of a market failure at the facilities level and that a strategic intervention is required by government to rectify the issue. Among Infraco's projects is to lay two 3Tb cables – one to Brazil and one to Europe.

“Eighty percent of our Internet costs are because of international connectivity charges,” says Raven Naidoo, chairman of independent telecommunications consultancy Radian. “Say an individual subscriber's costs are 10c per megabyte, and Seacom's pricing is right, then the cost should go down to about 4c. Infraco's pricing will mean that it will only go down to 8c.”

However, whether SA would be allowed to enjoy the benefits of a private cable company is open to question, as the Department of Communications seems to be lukewarm to the idea.

Communications department director-general Lyndall Shope-Mafole stated last week the country would give priority to the Nepad Broadband Infrastructure Network, that guidelines for landing foreign cables have not been drafted, and that it feels private ventures would not necessarily reduce the cost of telecommunications.

Seacom believes its model meets the requirements of an open access, non-discriminatory cable system based on a low-cost, high-volume business.

Related story:
Telkom price cuts take effect

วันจันทร์ที่ 6 สิงหาคม พ.ศ. 2550

จับตาจุดเปลี่ยนสมรภูมิสื่อสาร "ค่าเชื่อมต่อ"ระเบิดเวลาลูกแรก

http://www.ntc.or.th/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2820&Itemid=208

จับตาจุดเปลี่ยนสมรภูมิแข่งขันยักษ์สื่อสารไทย หลัง "กทช." ทยอยประกาศใช้ "กฎ-กติกา" ใหม่ "นักวิเคราะห์-วงในธุรกิจโทรคมนาคม" ประสานเสียงฟันธง "อินเตอร์คอนเน็กชั่นชาร์จ" เป็นระเบิดเวลาลูกแรก เร่งอุณหภูมิร้อนแข่งดุ และจุดพลุกรณีพิพาท เชื่อ "ยักษ์มือถือ" เตรียมปรับกระบวนรบรับมืออุตลุด ทั้งชี้โครงสร้างราคาและสภาพการแข่งขันอาจถึงจุดเปลี่ยนแปลงครั้งสำคัญ แต่เชื่อส่งผลดีต่อการขยายตัวของธุรกิจ


ประชาชาติธุรกิจ 1 พ.ค. 2549
จับตาจุดเปลี่ยนสมรภูมิแข่งขันยักษ์สื่อสารไทย หลัง "กทช." ทยอยประกาศใช้ "กฎ-กติกา" ใหม่ "นักวิเคราะห์-วงในธุรกิจโทรคมนาคม" ประสานเสียงฟันธง "อินเตอร์คอนเน็กชั่นชาร์จ" เป็นระเบิดเวลาลูกแรก เร่งอุณหภูมิร้อนแข่งดุ และจุดพลุกรณีพิพาท เชื่อ "ยักษ์มือถือ" เตรียมปรับกระบวนรบรับมืออุตลุด ทั้งชี้โครงสร้างราคาและสภาพการแข่งขันอาจถึงจุดเปลี่ยนแปลงครั้งสำคัญ แต่เชื่อส่งผลดีต่อการขยายตัวของธุรกิจ

การเพิ่มดีกรีความเข้มข้นของการกำกับดูแลกิจการโทรคมนาคมไทยของคณะกรรมการกิจการโทรคมนาคมแห่งชาติ (กทช.) ด้วยการเร่งมือผลักดันหลักเกณฑ์ และกฎกติกาใหม่ๆ เพื่อบังคับใช้กับผู้ประกอบธุรกิจสื่อสารในเมืองไทยกำลังได้รับการจับตามองด้วยใจระทึกพลันจากทั่วสารทิศ บนพื้นฐานความเชื่อที่ว่าน่าจะจุดพลุให้เกิดการเปลี่ยนแปลงทั้งต่อการแข่งขันของตลาดโดยรวม การดำเนินธุรกิจของผู้ประกอบการ หรือแม้แต่ผู้บริโภคในฐานะผู้ใช้บริการอย่างมากมายทีเดียวในอนาคตอันใกล้นี้ !!!

ไม่ว่าจะเป็นหลักเกณฑ์การเชื่อมต่อโครงข่าย (อินเตอร์คอนเน็กชั่นชาร์จ), หลักเกณฑ์เกี่ยวกับมาตรฐานของสัญญาให้บริการโทรคมนาคม, ร่างประกาศ กทช.ว่าด้วยการเปลี่ยนแปลงอัตราค่าธรรมเนียม และค่าบริการในกิจการโทรคมนาคม, ประกาศว่าด้วยมาตรการเพื่อป้องกันมิให้มีการกระทำอันเป็นการผูกขาด หรือก่อให้เกิดความไม่เป็นธรรมในการแข่งขันในกิจการโทรคมนาคม รวมถึงประกาศ กทช.ว่าด้วยสัญญาอันเกี่ยวเนื่องกับการประกอบกิจการโทรคมนาคมที่ทำกับต่างประเทศ เป็นต้น

"นักวิเคราะห์" และบรรดายักษ์มือถือต่างเห็นตรงกันว่า การเปลี่ยนแปลงที่เกิดขึ้นเป็นอันดับแรกจะเกิดจากการประกาศใช้ "อินเตอร์คอนเน็กชั่นชาร์จ" เนื่องจากจะผลักดันให้เกิดการเปลี่ยนแปลงแก้ไขสัญญาสัมปทานบริการโทรศัพท์มือถือ หรืออย่างมากที่สุดอาจลามถึงขั้นมีการยกเลิกการจ่ายส่วนแบ่งรายได้ของผู้รับสัมปทานด้วย

"ผู้รับสัมปทานในฝั่ง บมจ.กสท.โทรคมนาคม ได้แก่ ดีแทค ทรูมูฟ และดีพีซี ปัจจุบันต้องจ่ายค่าเช่าวงจร (แอ็กเซสชาร์จ) ให้ บมจ.ทีโอที แต่หลังการประกาศใช้อินเตอร์คอนเน็กชั่นชาร์จแล้วอาจมีบางรายตัดสินใจหยุดจ่าย เพราะมองว่าระบบอินเตอร์คอนเน็กชั่นชาร์จจะมาแทนแอ็กเซสชาร์จ ซึ่งผู้รับสัมปทานในฝั่งของ กสทฯคงต้องมีการเจรจากับทีโอทีในเรื่องดังกล่าว ซึ่งบทสรุปจะออกมาในรูปแบบใดเป็นเรื่องที่น่าจับตาอย่างยิ่ง แต่มีแนวโน้มว่าอาจตกลงกันไม่ได้จนต้องฟ้องร้องกันในชั้นศาล" นักวิเคราะห์กล่าวและว่า

ผู้ประกอบการที่มีเครือข่ายมากที่สุดจะอยู่ในจุดที่ได้เปรียบ หากมีการนำระบบอินเตอร์คอนเน็กชั่นชาร์จมาใช้ เนื่องจากจะมีรายได้จากการรับสายเข้าด้วย จากเดิมที่มีรายได้เฉพาะการโทร.ออกเท่านั้น ซึ่งผู้ที่มีเครือข่ายครอบคลุมมากที่สุดในปัจจุบันคือ เอไอเอส อย่างไรก็ตาม เรื่องดังกล่าวจะเป็นผลดีต่อดีแทค, ทรูมูฟ และดีพีซีด้วย เพราะมีโอกาสทำให้ต้นทุนทางธุรกิจลดต่ำลงจากการยกเลิกการจ่ายแอ็กเซสชาร์จที่แต่ละบริษัทต้องจ่ายเป็นเงินหลายพันล้านบาท

ด้านนายศุภชัย เจียรวนนท์ ประธานเจ้าหน้าที่บริหาร บมจ.ทรู คอร์ปอเรชั่น และบริษัท ทรูมูฟ จำกัด กล่าวว่า ทรูมูฟอาจตัดสินใจหยุดจ่ายค่าแอ็กเซสชาร์จในทันทีที่มีการนำหลักเกณฑ์การเชื่อมต่อโครงข่าย หรืออินเตอร์คอนเน็กชั่นชาร์จมาใช้ และระบบเคลียริ่งเฮาส์พร้อมแล้ว เนื่องจากมองว่ารูปแบบการจ่ายแอ็กเซสชาร์จไม่ควรมีอีกต่อไปเมื่อมีการนำหลักเกณฑ์การเชื่อมต่อโครงข่ายแบบใหม่มาใช้

"อาจต้องมีการตีความกันก่อนว่า สัญญาแอ็กเซสชาร์จที่มีอยู่เดิม ซึ่งไม่ใช่สัญญาสัมปทาน ถ้ายังคงจ่ายอยู่เหมือนเดิม เมื่อมีการนำอินเตอร์คอนเน็กชั่นชาร์จมาใช้แล้ว ถ้าจ่ายต่อผิดกฎหมายข้อไหนหรือไม่ด้วย แต่ผมเองมองว่าแอ็กเซสชาร์จก็ควรยกเลิกไปในทันทีที่มีอินเตอร์คอนเน็กชั่นชาร์จแล้ว ซึ่งหลังจาก กทช.มีการประกาศใช้เป็นทางการแล้ว แต่ละบริษัทคงต้องมีการเจรจากัน ซึ่งการนำมาใช้ในทางเทคนิคไม่ใช่เรื่องยาก ขอให้มีเคลียริ่งเฮาส์ ซึ่งมีหลายบริษัททำเรื่องนี้อยู่"

นายศุภชัยกล่าวต่อว่า ปีที่ผ่านมาทรูมูฟจ่ายค่าแอ็กเซสชาร์จให้ บมจ.ทีโอทีเป็นเงินประมาณ 4,000 ล้านบาท และคาดว่าปีนี้จะจ่ายมากขึ้น เนื่องจากมีฐานลูกค้าเพิ่มขึ้น ซึ่งหากรวมกับที่จ่ายมาในอดีตแล้วจะเกินกว่า 10,000 ล้านบาท

แหล่งข่าวในวงการโทรคมนาคมกล่าวกับ "ประชาชาติธุรกิจ" ว่า บมจ.ทีโอทีจะเป็นผู้ที่ได้รับผลกระทบมากที่สุด โดยเฉพาะในเบื้องต้น เนื่องจากเดิมเคยมีรายได้จากค่าแอ็กเซสชาร์จเป็นเงินหลายพันล้านบาทต่อปี ซึ่งกรณีดังกล่าวน่าจะเป็นปัญหาหลักที่ทำให้การทำข้อตกลงเรื่องการเชื่อมต่อโครงข่ายมีความล่าช้า หลัง กทช.ประกาศใช้หลักเกณฑ์ดังกล่าวแล้ว

"กฎบางอย่างที่ระบุอยู่ในมาตรฐานสัญญาบริการโทรคมนาคม ซึ่ง กทช.มีร่างออกมาแล้ว และกำลังจะทำประชาพิจารณ์ในช่วงปลายเดือน พ.ค.นี้ โดยเฉพาะเรื่องเกี่ยวกับการยกเลิกวันหมดอายุบัตรเติมเงินจะมีผลกระทบต่อผู้ให้บริการมือถือด้วยเช่นกัน เพราะจะประเมินรายได้ต่อเลขหมายต่อเดือนได้ยาก เนื่องจากรายได้ขั้นต่ำต่อเดือนที่เคยอยู่ที่ 300 บาท (บัตรเติมเงินมูลค่า 300 บาท ใช้ได้นาน 1 เดือน) จะหายไป แต่ถ้าคิดในภาพรวมแล้วคงไม่มีผลกระทบ หากมีการนำมาใช้หลังอินเตอร์คอนเน็กชั่นชาร์จ เพราะผู้ให้บริการจะมีรายได้จากการรับสายเข้าด้วย จากเดิมที่มีรายได้เฉพาะเมื่อลูกค้าโทร.ออกเท่านั้น"

แหล่งข่าวกล่าวต่อว่า ผู้ให้บริการโทรคมนาคมต้องปรับตัว และเตรียมการเพื่อรับมือกับการเปลี่ยนแปลงใหม่ๆ ที่จะเกิดขึ้นจากการประกาศหลักเกณฑ์ใหม่ๆ ในการกำกับดูแลกิจการโทรคมนาคมของ กทช.ด้วย ซึ่งกฎและกติกาใหม่ๆ จะทำให้เกิดการเปลี่ยนแปลงในธุรกิจโทรคมนาคมไทยในหลายด้านด้วยกัน เช่น เมื่อมีการใช้อินเตอร์คอนเน็กชั่นชาร์จจะส่งผลให้โปรโมชั่นค่าโทร.ราคาต่ำมากๆ ลดความร้อนแรงลง เพราะเมื่อลูกค้าโทร.ข้ามเครือข่าย ผู้ให้บริการต้องเสียค่าเชื่อมต่อให้อีกเครือข่ายด้วย

"โครงสร้างราคามือถือ รวมถึงการแข่งขันมีโอกาสเดินไปถึงจุดเปลี่ยนครั้งสำคัญในเร็ววันนี้ ซึ่งเชื่อว่าผู้ประกอบการแต่ละรายต่างคาดการณ์ถึงสิ่งที่จะเกิดขึ้นได้อยู่แล้ว เพราะกรณีอินเตอร์คอนเน็กชั่นชาร์จก็เป็นสิ่งที่มีใช้อยู่แล้วในต่างประเทศ จึงมีตัวอย่างให้เห็นว่าจะเกิดอะไรขึ้นบ้าง หรือกรณีการใช้เบอร์เดียวทุกระบบที่ กทช.กำลังเร่งดำเนินการอยู่ ถ้าใช้ได้เมื่อไร การแข่งขันก็อาจยิ่งรุนแรงขึ้นอีก เพราะการเปลี่ยนค่ายจะทำได้ง่ายมาก แต่ทั้งหมดจะส่งผลดีต่อธุรกิจโดยรวมทำให้ตลาดขยายตัวขึ้นอีก"

แหล่งข่าวจาก บมจ.แอดวานซ์ อินโฟร์ เซอร์วิส กล่าวกับ "ประชาชาติธุรกิจ" ว่า เอไอเอสมั่นใจว่าจะมีรายได้เพิ่มขึ้นจากอินเตอร์คอนเน็กชั่นชาร์จ เพราะการมีเครือข่ายที่ครอบคลุมมากที่สุด และมีฐานลูกค้ามากที่สุดทำให้มีโอกาสที่จะมีเป็นฝ่ายรับสายเข้ามากกว่า ขณะที่ปริมาณการโทร.ภายในเครือข่ายของเอไอเอสเองก็มีอยู่มากพอๆ กับการโทร.ไปยังเครือข่ายคู่แข่ง นอกจากนี้เอไอเอสยังอยู่ระหว่างการเตรียมการที่จะปรับโครงสร้างอัตราค่าบริการ เพื่อให้สอดคล้องกับพฤติกรรมการใช้งานของลูกค้าแต่ละกลุ่มมากยิ่งขึ้นด้วย แต่ยังไม่สามารถเปิดเผยรายละเอียดใดๆ ได้ในขณะนี้ แต่หากมีการนำมาใช้เชื่อว่าจะสร้างการเปลี่ยนแปลงให้กับตลาดได้อย่างแน่นอน

COMMENT: WiMax works, even if the policy doesn't

While Helen Coonan and DCITA might be able to confidently assert that the legalities and processes behind the $958m Broadband Connect Opel funding were all above aboard, it certainly all comes across as rather opaque and cloudy to the interested outsider. Broadband Connect was conceived in the pork barrel—there was never a serious attempt to find a market solution to the regional broadband deficit—and as a result, the resulting output has the consistency of, well, lard!

The original Broadband Connect mission was quite vague—to provide broadband to underserved areas—and it was an Optus submission to DCITA in early 2006 that probably best expressed an actually workable if not necessarily superior program objective: that it should specifically fund competitive infrastructure and create a duopoly of sorts in regional Australia.

Given that this is what the Opel proposal specifically entails, its fair to say that Optus was on the money as long as 16 months ago.

Indeed, Opel’s plan is less ambitious and radical than some might have us believe.

In terms of service delivery, much of it will simply entail the delivery of a wholesale ADSL2+ service over existing Telstra infrastructure—with a percentage of opex going back to Telstra in the form of $27 Band 3 ULL charges. This is nothing more than public subsidy for the resale of an existing unbundled network, albeit with the subsidy going to the reseller and not the network loop owner! (Surely the ACCC will have to abandon the pretence that a $2.50 line sharing charge is sustainable in regional areas when Telstra’s line rental charges would be lucky to recover three quarters of costs there, at best)

Customers outside the optimal ADSL2+ zone will be offered fixed 802.16d WiMax instead, again hardly radical given the preponderance of regional wireless in Australia. But this is a technology that Telstra claims will not work. Telstra’s claims here are overblown, but there is a central truth in its opposition to the contract award.

Why hand $958m of public money to a proposal that is instantly crimped—and made less economic—by the use of sub-optimal spectrum? ACMA, and its antecedent ACA, have been talking about opening up spectrum for this very purpose for years now—can there be a more compelling reason to bite the bullet on spectrum reform than extracting maximum value from $958m of public funding? That said, WiMax at 5.8GHz will work.

Claims that the use of unlicensed spectrum will create significant interference issues are simply incorrect and seem based on a misunderstanding of the sheer scale of spectrum available in that band. Indeed, referring to it as 5.8 is a misnomer, it should be more accurately described as 5.4 to 5.8 as the band plan provides 375 MHz of spectrum. With WiMax operating via a 10MHz carrier, that’s some giant multi-lane highway. A wireless broadband network could typically operate in less than one-tenth of the spectrum available in the 5.8 band.

FEW INTERFERENCE ISSUES: Jason Ashton of Big Air has been using 5.8GHz spectrum in the considerably more crowded Sydney metro area for nearly five years now and he tells me he could count the number of interference incidents in that time “one one hand.” WiMax has considerably better attributes than the souped up WiFi and proprietary systems currently in use—about twice the spectral efficiency and a media access controller policy that allocates a slot to each user at the session outset without the need for them to continually re-compete for spectrum resource.

There’s also a sweet irony in Telstra’s characterisation of fixed WiMax as a soon-to-be-orphaned technology. Funnily enough, one of the major global drivers behind fixed WiMax is the type of regulatory regime that Telstra would like to see implemented in Australia. Regulators in markets such as Saudi Arabia and Malaysia have observed the messiness and difficulties of local loop unbundling policies and have instead pursued the approach of multi-modal competition—specifically pushing WiMax as an enabler of broadband competition. Indeed, consultancy Maravedis estimates that 36% of all wireless broadband deployments in the world use 802.16d.

That said, Telstra still has legitimate questions to ask of Helen Coonan when they enter court tomorrow. It seems nonsensical to tip $958m into the creation of an artificial duopoly without an accompanying refit of spectrum policy, the under-funded universal service regime and the current dog’s breakfast of regulated access prices. The regulatory regime may well play catch up on some of these outstanding issues but one is hardly filled with confidence that it will get the settings right. The $958m cuts right through a great number of the assumptions that have driven inquiry after inquiry over the past ten years. But that’s what the cut through of electoral imperatives does to policy.

POLITICS: Indeed if there is a lesson to be learned here, it is that telecommunications is inherently political but that too many of its major players simply don’t get the politics. After all, just two of Australia’s 167 carriers—Optus and Macquarie—make donations to political parties (they both donate to both sides of politics). This is absolutely astonishing for a bunch of companies that depend so much on political and regulatory dispensation for their very existence, and especially when one considers the sums devoted to sports sponsorships of dubious marketing and brand merit.

I’m not from the school of thought that sees corporate donations to political parties as sordid—indeed it’s an essential aspect to sustaining the multi-party democracy we take for granted at a time when voluntary participation and activism from lay party members is ebbing away in the face of the demands of modern life.

It is no surprise that Optus might bag a contract like Broadband Connect because it has consistently shown it can read the political wind better than other carriers. It is the only carrier—alongside Macquarie—to participate meaningfully in the political process, not just through donations but through affiliate activities such as sponsorship of the Australian Local Government Association. Politics is about access, and access gives you the information you need to second guess the political process. (I don’t count entities like the Competitive Carriers’ Coalition or T4 as meaningful vehicles of political engagement—the CCC has less resources than a typical students union, T4 is little more than an eccentric website).

Consumer and competition law of the type that sustains the business cases of many of those 167 carriers is the direct result of multi-party democracy, the only system that reliably empowers consumers with a political voice. I’m sympathetic to those losing bidders who complain that they never even got a phone call as Opel was invited back in for DCITA pow wows, but in the end it was their failure to engage in the process and understand the presentational and political requirements of the paymaster that ensured their bids wouldn’t pass muster.

Anyone who has spent more than ten minutes with a Coonan staffer will learn that she is 100% driven by how her actions play with consumers. Personally I feel that such an approach sells short the historic mission of her particular government –which is partly to create a nation of self-reliant shareholders as much as regulation-sheltered consumers. But whatever the case, Coonan is concerned with the political perceptions of consumers. It might make for messy policy and a bad look to those in the know, but it’s simply a fact that Opel understood and others didn’t.

Local loop battle might be fought outside big cities

By TOM PULLAR-STRECKER - The Dominion Post | Monday, 6 August 2007

It has been widely assumed that if the Commerce Commission presses ahead and sets a lower price for accessing the local loop in big cities and a higher one in smaller towns and rural New Zealand, rival telcos will have more incentive to install their own infrastructure in the big cities than elsewhere.

But it may not prove that simple, and it could even be larger provincial towns that provide the richest pickings for any telcos brave enough to install their own equipment in Telecom's exchanges.

The commission last week signalled it would set an average price for access to Telecom's local loop of $20.77 a month, at the low-end of analysts' expectations of a $20-$25 charge.

It also opted to de-average access to the local loop, but only to a small degree, creating two price bands and splitting off a seemingly arbitrary 27 per cent of lines in non-urban areas. There, the local loop access charge will be $32.20, helping the push access price in the big cities down to $16.42.

The approach the commission took seems to have been to pick a price at which it reckoned unbundling might become an attractive proposition, and then stretch that out across as much of the country as it could, at the risk of brassing off people in the regions.

Cynics see politics playing a part in that calculation, noting that the 27 per cent of people who now face higher telco charges mostly live in areas that are not Labour strongholds.

Telecom signalled, subtely but clearly, at its results briefing on Friday that people who live outside the main centres would face higher phone line rentals than city-dwellers if the Commerce Commission's de-averaging decision was upheld. Its retail arm will have no choice but to pass the different access charges on to its customers, just as its rivals would also need to if they chose to engage in infrastructure competition outside the main centres.

Under operational separation, Telecom Retail will be in the same boat as every other telco when it comes to purchasing access to the local loop, the company pointed out. But by the same token, Telecom's rivals could get away with charging a higher price for phone lines and bundled services in the $32.20 zone, while remaining competitive with Telecom.

Assuming rival infrastructure providers would be better placed to undercut Telecom in urban areas, just because they will pay less to access the local loop, is to assume that Telecom's own pricing would not change in line with the charges set out by the Commerce Commission.

In fact, investing outside the major centres could be more attractive. Telecom has signalled it is first likely to scrap its exchanges and roll out fibre to roadside cabinets in the urban centres, leaving cabinetisation in provincial towns and rural areas till later.

Investing in local loop unbundling in the big cities therefore carries a heightened risk that competitors will see their exchange equipment "stranded" as a result of the wider deployment of fibre and they will have to earn a quicker return there, to compensate.

Access to exchanges in the very centres of Auckland, Wellington and Christchurch may be sought-after because of the high-value customers that infrastructure providers would be able to reach after they are unbundled. But it's possible provincial towns – where spending on toll calls can be high – may prove a richer target for second tier telcos than the suburbs of the big centres, notwithstanding the higher local loop access charge.

Though it may prove a useful pressure valve, competition on the local loop will not substantially improve New Zealand's broadband network.

This is if, as most experts believe, it's long copper phone lines and lack of fibre that is holding back users' experiences, rather than a lack of dslams in exchanges.

These are issues that may be better addressed next year by the relativity of access prices for local loop and sub- loop unbundling.

The worst case scenario for the Government is that rival telcos are still unable to compete with Telecom Retail on the local loop post-unbundling, the lower wholesale prices that feed through from Telecom Retail getting cheaper access to the local loop go unnoticed in the main centres, and rural voters take umbrage from price hikes.

There is plenty of room for different views on whether the pricing proposed by the commission is fair, and there is water to go under the bridge. But it's ironic that the first nail in the coffin for New Zealand's previously egalitarian pricing regime for telecommunications services may be hammered in under a Labour government.

US West to Assess Access Charges for Internet Telephony

September 14, 1998) On Friday, September 11, US West became the second Regional Bell Operating Company (RBOC) to announce that it would attempt to collect access charges on packet switched, Internet protocol, telephony. On September 2 BellSouth made a similar announcement. Since "information services" are not regulated by the FCC, and are exempt from access charges, IP telephony providers are likely to challenge the moves in court and/or before the FCC.
US West's Announcement

On Friday US West, Inc. wrote a letter to Internet protocol (IP) phone service providers which stated:

"Effective immediately, U S WEST will no longer process orders for local exchange service used to provide interstate or intrastate toll services, even if the toll transmission medium is a packet switched network and even if the Internet protocol is used for such transmission."

The letter went on to explain that the "fact that such toll calls are transmitted by the toll carrier via packet switched, rather than circuit switched, technology does not relieve toll carriers of the requirement to order the correct facilities and to pay the appropriate access rates for service."

"These companies should pay their fair share, as required by federal law," said Mark Roellig in a press release on Friday. Roellig is US West's Executive VP for Public Policy, Human Resources and Law. He continued that, "These charges are vital for funding local phone service for people in rural and other high-cost communities. All companies using the local network to complete long-distance calls are required to pay these fees, regardless of the technology they use to complete the calls."

Convergence

The telecommunications and Internet industries are converging. Also, the design of phones and computers are converging, as phones take on microprocessors, and computer take on speakers and microphones. IP telephony is presenting itself as a realistic alternative to old fashioned analog circuit switched phone company service. As its technology advances, it may become more efficient, more versatile, and cheaper.

How much of the cost advantage may be due to being exempt from access charges, universal service taxes, and FCC regulation, is debated. But whatever the case, the old technology phone companies are taking notice, and taking action. The actions of BellSouth and US West, if carried out, would raise the price of the competing IP telephony services, while increasing the monopoly rents collected by the local phone companies.

How the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) will respond is uncertain. It issued an advisory, non-binding, Report to Congress on universal service on April 10 which suggested that phone-to-phone IP telephony ought to be treated as a regulated "telecommunications" service, rather than an unregulated "information" service. As the technologies converge, the FCC could use the unregulated status of the information services to in effect deregulate some currently regulated functions. On the other hand, the FCC could use convergence as excuse to extend its regulatory grasp into computer and Internet industry.

Access Charges

US West and BellSouth collect access charges from Interexchange Carriers (IXCs) such as AT&T and MCI WorldCom to originate and terminate long distance telephone calls. This revenue supports the cost of maintaining local facilities. However, under FCC rules, access charges apply to "telecommunications" services, but not to "information" or "enhanced" services. For example, Internet Service Providers (ISPs), as "information" services, are exempt under FCC rules from paying access charges.

IP telephony providers use Internet protocol, packet switching, to transfer digital voice data. The technology is Internet, but the service increasingly resembles in function old fashioned circuit switched technology. It also appears to be a major source of competition for the old circuit switched phone companies.

Legal Authority

The question of whether the regional Bell operating companies (RBOCs) can collect access charges from IP telephony providers is a matter of debate. On September 2 Bell South was the first RBOC to assert the claim. Bell South cited the FCC's April 10, 1998 "Report to Congress" on universal service as authority for its decision.

47 CFR 69.5(b)

"Sec. 69.5 Persons to be assessed.
(b) Carrier's carrier charges shall be computed and assessed upon all interexchange carriers that use local exchange switching facilities for the provision of interstate or foreign telecommunications services."

US West is not relying on the April 10 Report. Instead, its letter to IP telephony providers stated that FCC Rule 69.5(b) is its authority. This letter stated that: "At the interstate level, a provider of toll service must pay carriers' carrier charges pursuant to Section 69.5(b) of the rules of the Federal Communications Commission whenever local exchange switching facilities are used for the origination or termination of a toll call. Similar charges must be assessed for origination or termination of an intrastate toll call."

US West's press release did make reference to the following quote from the April 10 Report: "certain IP telephony services lack the characteristics that would render them 'information services' and instead bear the characteristics of telecommunications services." However, Emily Harrison, a spokesman for US West, added in an interview that US West is not relying on the April 10 Report; it relies on Rule 69.5(b).

Yet, 69.5(b) is merely the rule that says IXCs pay access charges. It is a brief section which was drafted before IP telephony was an issue. It does not even mention IP telephony.

The debate is not likely to be resolved soon.

Telephony Regulations and the Internet

From http://www2.sims.berkeley.edu/resources/infoecon/Regulate/

Background

Overview of Berkeley workshop
Describes the issues to be examined.
Extract from FCC NPRM 96488
This two-page extract contains the relevant passages from the FCC NPPR on access charge reform having to do with Internet service providers.
FCC Fact Sheet
About "the FCC, Internet Service Providers, and access charges."
FCC Bandwidth Forum
This is a transcript of the Jan 23, 1997 hearings on the prospects for high-speed residental communications. Also available in WordPerfect format.
Digital Tornado: The Internet and Telecommunications Policy
"Digital Tornado", written by FCC Staff Member Kevin Werbach, represents the first comprehensive assessment of the questions the Internet poses for traditional communications policy.
Final agenda
Agenda for workshop.

Congestion at the local loop

Local Exchange Congestion and Internet Service Providers
By Hal Varian. This is a short overview of the economic issues involving local exchange congestion due to dialup access of Internet service providers. It is based on a talk on this subject that I gave on March 7, 1997 at a conference entitled ``Telecommunications Regulation and the Internet'' at UC Berkeley.
Telcos, ISPs, and the Internet
An analysis by Arno Penzias of Lucent. He argues that the appropriate solution is non-blocking switches.
Internet economics: the FCC chimes in
Overview of Internet regulatory problems facing FCC.
McCain quote
About LEC switch congestion.
Bell Company Studies
Four studies of impact of dial-up Internet access on LECs. (Maintained by HREF="http://www.cix.org">CIX, which also has other useful information.)
Report of Bell Atlantic on Internet Traffic
Reports on the impact of ISPs on local switch congestion.
Internet congestion: crisis or come on?
Remarks by Michael Fitzpatrick, President and CEO, Pacific Bell Enterprises about congestion at the local loop.
Surfing the "Second-Wave": Sustainable Internet Growth and Public Policy - Part I
This "whitepaper" was developed to describe the Internet's impact on Pacific Bell's existing voice telephone network and articulate product and regulatory actions essential to jump-starting the "Second-Wave" of Internet growth.
PCN - Internet Thruway
Description of product that "removes the burden of long-duration data and Internet traffic on the voice network by elegantly diverting these calls to a data network."
Lucent's Access Interface Unit (AIU)
A new cost-effective non-blocking line unit for the 5ESS0 Switch that will be generally available in 1996. This line unit initially supports enhanced performance and reduced operational costs for analog connections, but will also support ISDN and ADSL in the future.
Too Much of a Good Thing
Overview of Bellcore report on "The Impacts of Internet Traffic on Local Exchange Carrier Networks and Switching Systems".
Pac Bell says Net use may collapse phone system
Article from San Jose Mercury News
ISDN rate hearings thrown for a loop: Microsoft offers fast, cheap alternative
4 POTS lines = 1 ISDN line.
DATA coaltion
News item about DATA coaltion, a group opposed to usage-based pricing for ISPs.
Telephone gridlock questioned
Another news item about DATA coalition.
Internet Access Coalition Home Page
A group dedicated to maintaining the affordability of Internet access over telephone lines and accelerating the availability of inexpensive digital telephone network connections to the Internet.
Comments on FCC Bandwidth Forum from James Love
Comments critical of LEC congestion claims.
The Effect of Internet Use on the Nation's Telephone Network
A study prepared for the by Lee for the Internet Access Coaltion by Selwyn and Joseph Laszlo of Economics and Technology, Inc. (This document is in PDF and requires Adobe Acrobat Reader. The document is 4.4MB.)
Discussion of FCC NOI
From law firm of Peppper and Corazzini.
Phone companies can't spare a dime
Article from NEWS.COM about congestion.

Bypass and access charges

FCC NOI on Interstate Access Charge Reform
Also available as a WordPerfect document.
FCC NPPR on Internet and Interstate Information Services
Tentatively concludes that providers of information services (including Internet service providers) should not be subject to interstate access charges that local telephone companies currently assess on long-distance carriers.
State of Internet Telephony
Overview of current state of internet telephony.
Background on Internet telephony
From the Internet Telephony Consortium.
Internet Telephony Consortium
MIT group offering information about Internet telephony.
The Effect of Internet Telephony on the Long Distance Voice Market
An economic analysis.
An analysis of the ACTA Filing to the FCC on Internet Telephony
A critique of the ACTA filing.
Voice on Internet Coalition
Group advocating voice on Internet.
Reveiw of 12Web phones from CNet
Comparative review.
Summary of ACTA Petition
Materials relating to petition by America's Carriers Telecommunications Association (ACTA), which asked that the sale Internet Telephony software be banned and that the FCC regulate the Internet as a telecommunications service.
ACTA petition page
More information on ACTA petition.
Videoconferencing FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions about video conferencing.
ISPs Ready Doomsday Defense To Thwart FCC Rule Change
Article describing alleged strategy by ISPs to avoid access charges.

Other resources

Telecom Information Resources on the Internet
Comprehensive set of links maintained at University of Michigan.
The Information Economy
Lots of links to materials having to do with information economics.
Telecommunications Act of 1996
Full text of Act.
High Bandwidth Web Page
Lots of links to pages about high bandwidth.
FCC
FCC homepage.

Other news items

Sending more of telecommunications company in the world

You can send unlisted telecommunications and broadband technology companies to us, please send them to: spratana824111@yahoo.com

Japan Leads the Way With New-generation Mobile, Broadband and Internet

India, Mumbai, July 25 – Japan continues to set the pace globally, recording substantial market growth for leading communications technologies such as third-generation mobile, fibre-to-the-home broadband and internet telephony

Source: Sunil Nair
Jul 26, 2007

(PRLog.Org) – The figures tell the story. "Telecoms, Mobile and Broadband in Japan 2007" "http://www.bharatbook.com/bookdetail.asp?bookid=25159" reports the 3G mobile market is already outpacing last year’s annual growth rate, which almost tipped a healthy 50 percent, one in four broadband services will have fibre-to-the-home by year’s end and at the same time some 18 million Japanese will be taking advantage of internet-protocol telephony services.

The rapid expansion of the 3G market has recently pushed subscriber numbers past 73 million. As well, while Japan has a mature mobiles market with almost eight in every 10 people with a mobile service, 76 percent of the country’s mobile subscriber base is hooked up to 3G.

The result is due partly to the growing sophistication of handsets, as well as the popularity of inbuilt cameras. But the competitive nature of the local market has played a hand too.

The world’s biggest telecommunications operator NTT Corp chased down rival KDDI’s big lead in 3G mobile, overhauled it in 2006 and this year NTT DoCoMo leads the market comfortably. Telco Softbank also applied pressure, buying mobile provider Vodafone K.K. for US$15.6 billion last year, and has since announced plans to unite its broadband and mobile services, which will include a video service to mobile subscribers.

With 26 million broadband lines, Japan ranks third behind China and the US. But the uptake of high-speed fibre-to-the-home broadband is spreading faster in Japan than anywhere else in the world. Last year, the FttH market grew by 70 percent, with subscribers forecast to jump from 7.9 million in 2006 to 11.5 million this year. According to the BuddeComm report, this will account for 40 percent of Japan’s total broadband access by year’s end.

There are several factors to explain this: a market competitiveness and readiness, solid government backing as well as a population that is both tech-savvy and consumer-mad.

At the same time, the popularity of DSL broadband is on the wane with almost 240,000 less subscribers forecast during 2007.

“A major advantage of FttH over DSL is the Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) costs,” the BuddeComm report states. “Unlike DSL, it is not necessary to pay a basic telephone subscriber charge when using FttH for IP telephony. As the use of video and image data grows, DSL subscribers are increasingly unhappy with the slower than expected and unstable throughput of DSL, which depends on how far their residence is from the local exchange.”

IP telephony is also going gangbusters with the market expected to leap about 4 million subscribers this year. IP provides a better range of voice and data services, more-efficiently, than a fixed-line system.

Importantly, Japan’s Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications announced it planned to replace the country’s domestic fixed-line telephone network with a fully integrated IP system by 2010 at a cost of around ¥50 billion. Japan’s biggest operators KDDI and NTT have unveiled plans to overhaul its fixed-lines services with IP by 2008 and 2010 respectively.

With IP mobile services expected by next year, BuddeComm predicts they will eat into the revenues of mobile operators, similar to the impact mobiles had on fixed-line telephony. “Under the proposed service, users would be able to connect their phones to the internet at ‘hot spots’ using WiFi wireless access,” the report states. “The VoIP mobile phones were expected to relay information at up to 15Mb/s; this compares to 3G phones available in the country transmitting data at 384kb/s.”

For More information Kindly visit : http://www.bharatbook.com/bookdetail.asp?bookid=25159

Mexican monopolist leads the world

von Adam Thomson (Mexico City)

With $67bn, Carlos Slim may be even richer than Bill Gates. How did he do it?


On a recent evening in a central neighbourhood of Mexico City, a well-known academic and acquaintance of Carlos Slim, the Mexican billionaire, tried to summarise what continues to drive the man who for years has been the country's richest individual. "Power," he concluded after barely a moment's thought.

If one measure of power is wealth, Mr Slim might already have reached his goal: Sentidocomún, a respected financial website, recently claimed that Mr Slim was now the world's richest individual, considerably more wealthy than Bill Gates of Microsoft fame.

Eduardo García, owner of Sentidocomún, calculates Mr Slim's wealth at more than $67bn, thanks mainly to the extraordinary second-quarter, 26.5 per cent rise in the share price of América Móvil, the pan-American cellular phone company in which he has a 33 per cent stake.

The increase, argues Mr García, boosted Mr Slim's personal wealth by an astonishing $10.8bn between April and June alone and now makes him about $8.6bn richer than Mr Gates, whose shares in Microsoft went up 5.7 per cent during the same period.

"If there were any doubt as to who is the richest businessman on the planet - Carlos Slim or Bill Gates - there isn't any longer," says Mr García.

In public, at least, Mr Slim - a swarthy, portly man with a chin that more often than not is covered in grey stubble - dismisses such valuations as being of "no real significance", however. When Forbes, the New York-based magazine, in March claimed that he was the world's second-richest man, Mr Slim held a rare press conference and said: "I have no more money now than I did 10 years ago."

"We haven't really done the calculations," says Arturo Elías Ayub, Mr Slim's son-in-law and the communications director of Carso Group, his main holding company. "This has simply come about because of the price of the shares, which luckily and thanks to a lot of hard work have gone up, but they are still the same shares in the same companies that he has had for years."

Whatever Mr Slim's exact wealth, there is no doubt that he has come a long way since the day in 1955 when his father, a shopkeeper and landowner, gave him 5,500 pesos with which to start his career.

Born in Mexico City in 1940 to a Lebanese immigrant who had arrived in Mexico after fleeing violence in his native country, Mr Slim soon began to show entrepreneurial flair: according to family members, the young Carlos would use family dinners and get-togethers as an opportunity to flog sweets and cigarettes.

The cash cow in Mr Slim's extensive business portfolio is Telmex, the former state-owned telecommunications company that he bought in 1990 as head of a consortium that included France Telecom, which he subsequently bought out, and Southwestern Bell of the US.


Today, Telmex dominates fixed-line telephony in Mexico, accounting for more than 90 per cent of the market. It is also extremely profitable: every year it generates earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation of more than $6bn, and enough free cash flow to pay for its original acquisition price.

In spite of its monopoly of landlines, Telmex was subsequently allowed to enter the wireless market, a business it would later spin off into América Móvil, which Mr Slim controls. The company has increased its subscriber rate by an average of 40 per cent a year since 2000.


Mr Slim's detractors - and there are many in a country in which roughly half the 105m population lives below the poverty line and in which per capita GDP is only about $7,000 - argue that the Mexican billionaire's wealth is the product of the monopolistic positions his companies enjoy, particularly in telecommunications.

"He's become so powerful in Mexico that he's turned into Big Brother," says the acquaintance. "Mexicans are angry about monopolies and how much they charge for everything."

Indeed, a recent report published by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development claimed that Mexico had some of the highest telephone charges of all its members.

Yet analysts say such points of view overlook the fact that Mr Slim has demonstrated time and again an uncanny ability to spot under-valued and under-managed companies and build them up. "He has an incredible knack of knowing when the worst is over and picking the time to buy," says Damian Fraser of UBS in Mexico City.

For all his money and ability, however, Mr Slim continues to lead a relatively modest life. For years he has shunned the luxury yachts and holiday villas that other Mexican billionaires have flaunted.

He still lives in the same family house he has occupied for decades and even continues to light his Cohiba cigars with disposable plastic lighters. Visitors to his windowless basement office in Mexico City often comment on the broken air conditioning.

Now 67 and a widower - his wife died in 1999 - and with rumours that he might be suffering from heart-related health problems, Mr Slim has promised to boost donations to his charitable foundations from $4bn to $10bn, committing funds for education and healthcare, and planning a network of up to 200 "casas Telmex" across the country to offer free computer and internet access in under-privileged urban areas.

THAILAND: TOT and CAT given 15 days to settle rates

If telecom operaters do not agree on standard interconnection charges within time frame, the National Telecommunications Commission will set the rates

Bangkok Post
Wednesday, May 17, 2006


By Komsan Tortermvasana

Local telecom operators have 15 days to settle and adopt standard interconnection charges, the National Telecommunications Commission (NTC) said yesterday. The NTC said it would intervene and set the charges if operators fail to reach an agreement.

However, operators and experts fear a new round of legal complications because the NTC has not set standard interconnection rates. The regulator has instead left it to the two state operators, TOT Plc and CAT Telecom, to settle on rates between themselves and with their concession holders.

According to Suranant Wongwittiyakamchorn, the NTC secretary, the interconnection regulation was published in the Royal Gazette yesterday and took effect immediately.

Interconnection rates are the fees operators charge each other for handling calls across different networks.

Mr Suranant said the regulation would apply only to TOT and CAT, since they were the only operators licensed by the NTC so far, and not to private operators.

TOT and CAT still had time to work out acceptable rates, he added.

He said the NTC wanted rates to be agreed on by both state enterprises, while rates for their concession holders should also be jointly agreed among private and state operators.

However, NTC commissioner Sudharma Yoonaidharma predicted more legal disputes after the regulation was enforced.

He said that the regulation mandated both TOT and CAT to settle on rates within 15 days, adding that the NTC would only intervene if they could not come to an agreement.

He cited legal disputes that had occurred at Deutsche Telekom when interconnection rates were introduced in Germany, adding that the NTC would set up a ruling chamber to defuse any problems.

The chamber will comprise nine outside experts to screen all disputes arising from the day the regulation was enforced.

Meanwhile, a TOT executive said TOT had a clear stance on access charges and would not yield to concession holders.

Under the concession structure, cellular operators pay a share of their revenues to TOT or CAT, depending on which body granted the concession. Operators under CAT concessions pay 200 baht per number per month for access to the TOT network. In return, they pay a smaller share of their revenue to CAT than market leader Advanced Info Service pays to its concession owner, TOT.

But the operators under CAT concessions, DTAC and True Move, say they are still at a disadvantage. If they have to pay interconnection fees, they say, the access charge should be scrapped.

TOT, which derives a large portion of its revenue from access charges, would face serious financial trouble if the revenue dried up.

The TOT executive said an access charge was a legal commitment between two contractual parties -- TOT and its concession holders -- which no other agency, even the NTC, had the right to abolish.

In addition, he said, no TOT president or board would be brave enough to scrap the access charge as it was a criminal offence to cause damage to the state.

Anuparb Thiralarp, the president of the Thailand Telecommunication Management Academy, said that although the interconnection regulation was a good thing, it would bring about complicated legal disputes.

He said the NTC had double standards in terms of the regulations.

The NTC supervises only TOT and CAT, its licensees, while private operators who are concession holders are still under the supervision of TOT and CAT.

Meanwhile, regulations related to standard contracts between operators and customers and tariff structures were enforced on all operators, he said.

Therefore, if a private operator disagreed with the interconnection rule, a legal dispute could arise because TOT and CAT could not force private operators to adopt the rates.

He also said all operators would have to protect their interests, particularly TOT which did not want mobile operators to stop paying access charges amounting to more than 20 billion baht a year.

Thai TOT told to resolve access charges

By Komsan Tortermvasana, Bangkok Post
Friday, July 06 2007 12:29 PM

Thailand's National Telecommunications Commission (NTC) has ordered TOT Plc to start negotiating access charges with mobile operator DTAC or risk penalties ranging from fines to the loss of telecom licenses.

Yesterday was the deadline the regulator had set for TOT to start talking with DTAC but the state telecom enterprise has still not responded to requests to discuss the months-old dispute.

DTAC, which holds a mobile phone concession from CAT Telecom, had earlier petitioned the Administrative Court for emergency protection after TOT threatened to block access to its network for three million new DTAC numbers.

True Move, also a CAT concessionaire, also sought same protection.

DTAC and True Move stopped paying access charges to TOT in November last year, arguing that they should pay interconnection charges instead to comply with the NTC rules.

The access charge is the cost that all three private cellular concessionaires of CAT Telecom--DTAC, True Move and Digital Phone--have paid to TOT for connecting to different networks through TOT facilities. TOT last year earned access-charge revenues of 14 billion baht (US$448.6 million).

The state enterprise refuses to adopt the new interconnection-charge system because it believes it would make less money than it does from access charges.

TOT to footnote access fees

TOT to footnote access fees

Komsan Tortermvasana
Jul 27, 2007 (Bangkok Post - McClatchy-Tribune Information Services via COMTEX) --

TOT Plc says it will split access charge earnings from its financial statement to more accurately reflect the company's financial position and will begin negotiating with private operators on interconnection charges.

Djit Laowattana, a member of the TOT board, said access charge earnings would appear as a note to the state enterprise's financial report. They would not be included in its revenue numbers because service providers have refused to pay the charges.

The mobile operators DTAC and True Move have withheld access payments since last November, arguing that TOT should adopt the interconnection-fee system approved by the National Telecommunications Commission. TOT has been reluctant to comply since it earns 14 billion baht a year from access charges and believes it would earn less under the new system.

The proposal would be submitted to the TOT board for approval today, Mr Djit said. If approved, access charges would appear as a remark in its monthly financial statement next month, he said.

He said that earnings from access charges were uncertain because all concession agreements made with private operators, DTAC and True Move, would soon expire.

He said that TOT had started to negotiate interconnection charges with private operators. He said DTAC had assured TOT that it would accept a flat-rate system, he said.

At present TOT earns 200 baht per number per month on postpaid service and 18 percent on prepaid services from DTAC and True Move.

To see more of the Bangkok Post, or to subscribe to the newspaper, go to
http://www.bangkokpost.com. Copyright (c) 2007, Bangkok Post, Thailand Distributed by
McClatchy-Tribune Information Services. For reprints, email
tmsreprints@permissionsgroup.com, call 800-374-7985 or 847-635-6550, send a fax to
847-635-6968, or write to The Permissions Group Inc., 1247 Milwaukee Ave., Suite 303,
Glenview, IL 60025, USA.

TOT to footnote access fees

Komsan Tortermvasana
Jul 27, 2007 (Bangkok Post - McClatchy-Tribune Information Services via COMTEX) --

TOT Plc says it will split access charge earnings from its financial statement to more accurately reflect the company's financial position and will begin negotiating with private operators on interconnection charges.

CAT suing cellcos for USD150m to pay TOT charges; payment could include Thai Mobile stake

The Bangkok Post reports that a protracted dispute appears to be nearing a climax with a decision by state-run CAT Telecom to pay network access charges to fellow government-owned fixed line operator TOT, and in turn sue True Move and DTAC, the two mobile operators that hold Build-Transfer-Operate (BTO) licences with CAT, for THB4.8 billion (USD150 million) in compensation. DTAC and True Move stopped paying network access charges to TOT in November last year, arguing that the new system of interconnection rates approved by the National Telecommunications Commission (NTC) should take precedence. TOT claims it is owed THB6 billion, and CAT has agreed to pay a first installment of THB2.4 billion on its mobile concessionaries’ behalf. However, in a further twist, an unnamed TOT executive said the payment would not be in cash, but that CAT would instead transfer its 42% equity stake in Thai Mobile, the struggling cellular joint venture between TOT and CAT. The stake has been valued at around THB2.4 billion. TOT had earlier offered to buy the shares to make it the sole owner of Thai Mobile, in the hope of reviving the business, which has debts of around THB6 billion.

The newspaper reports that the Ministry of Information & Communication Technology has given CAT the green light to take DTAC and True Move to the Civil Court. Under the terms of the original BTO concessions, CAT believes that it can seek compensation worth double the amount of access charges it has to pay. TOT, meanwhile, continues to insist that it should be allowed to collect access charges for the mobile operators’ use of its network, and regards access charges as a separate issue. The incumbent earned around THB14 billion last year from access charges. The three major cellular operators – Advanced Info Service (AIS, which operates under a BTO concession with TOT), DTAC and True Move – have signed interconnection agreements, but whilst DTAC and True Move are collecting the fees from each other, AIS has not begun to do so because it fears a lawsuit from TOT for breaching its licence. Sigve Brekke, chief executive of DTAC, disputed CAT's contention that it is entitled to compensation at twice the amount of outstanding charges: ‘I'm 100% confident…We've never seen any statement that identified a double fine,’ he said. Mr Brekke said that DTAC, which was listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand on Friday, had provided calculations of both access and interconnection charges in its first-quarter financial statement, which resulted in roughly equal totals. ‘We don't care what TOT is doing,’ he said. ‘We're sure about the access charge case following a study by our legal team, which coincides with a recent decision by the NTC to order TOT to enter into talks with DTAC for an interconnection agreement.’

SaskTel gains control of rates

CRTC approves Crown's application, more competition expected in market

Cassandra Kyle, The StarPhoenix

Published: Saturday, August 04, 2007

SaskTel will no longer have to apply to a federal body for approval before changing phone service rates in Saskatoon, meaning more competition in the local market.

On Friday, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) handed down a decision approving an April SaskTel forbearance application. The company can now change prices on basic local phone service -- as well as on features such as call display and on installation fees and other service charges -- without waiting for approval. They are also now able to make changes to service bundles independently. SaskTel's phone services had been regulated by the CRTC since 2000. SaskTel's Internet, TV and cellular services remain unregulated.

John Meldrum, SaskTel's vice-president of corporate counsel and regulatory affairs, said the decision will let market forces govern prices, rather than regulatory rules. The change will allow them to better compete with the city's other major phone service providers Shaw Communications and Rogers Communications Inc., whose phone service is not regulated by the CRTC. When SaskTel would apply to make changes before Friday's decision, the other companies often found out what they wanted to change.



"Really, what it meant was you didn't change your rates at all, and if you did it was minimal," he said.

A cap on prices came with the CRTC's decision, meaning SaskTel prices can't go higher than they are now. Customers don't have to be concerned their phone companies are going to hike their rates, he said.

While the CRTC decision affects the Saskatoon exchange, which includes the city and nearby communities, Regina and rural areas will not see any changes. Meldrum said SaskTel plans on applying for forbearance in Regina before the end of the year.

"It's not an easy issue for a place like Saskatchewan. It might be easier to charge a different rate in Toronto or Montreal, but it's not going to be easy to change the rates in Saskatoon and not Regina," he said.

SaskTel can't apply for Regina forbearance any earlier due to an 18-month grace period given to Regina's Access Communications, a small rural cable company under CRTC classification, which came into effect when Access began offering phone service earlier this year. SaskTel is also appealing a CRTC decision to raise basic phone service prices in rural Saskatchewan.

Meldrum said Saskatoon rate changes and new service bundles are on their way, but won't be immediate. Overall, he said, the competition between local phone companies will give customers more options.

ckyle@sp.canwest.com

วันศุกร์ที่ 3 สิงหาคม พ.ศ. 2550

In satellite radio offer, a question for cable

The XM-Sirius choice plan has some asking why TV viewers can't pick channels

A plan by the nation's two satellite radio companies to let consumers pick the channels they want to pay for could reignite a debate about consumer choice in the cable television industry.

"I think it will raise the profile on the issue again and people should legitimately ask if XM and Sirius can do this with radio in order to get their deal done, why can't the cable companies do this, too?" said Bob Williams, director of hearusnow.org, a website focusing on telecommunications issues that's run by Consumers Union, a group pushing for so-called a la carte pricing in cable.

In an attempt to persuade lawmakers that their planned merger won't limit choices for subscribers, XM Satellite Radio and Sirius Satellite Radio said last week that they would allow consumers to pick which stations they want to subscribe to, as opposed to buying all their stations in one package. Analysts say the move is motivated by the companies' desire to quell anticompetitive concerns about the merger in Congress.

Under their plan, consumers could pick 50 XM channels or 50 Sirius channels for $6.99 per month. They could also pay $14.99 per month to pick 100 channels from both services' menus. Additional channels could be bought for 25 cents per month each. Currently, XM charges $12.95 per month for 170 channels and Sirius charges the same for 165 channels.

Joy Simmons, a spokeswoman for the National Cable & Telecommunications Association, declined comment on XM and Sirius's plans.

While Williams and other supporters of a la carte pricing say satellite radio is similar to cable in that it is a subscription-based business in which customers pay monthly fees for access to multiple channels of programming, cable industry insiders dismiss the comparison.

Cable's economics differ from those of satellite radio because television has higher production costs, said Stephen R. Effros, a cable industry consultant and former FCC attorney. Beyond that, he said, the radio a-la-carte proposals suggest that a la carte would drive up consumers' prices.

"If you don't get the channels you want in that first 100 package, it's 25 cents a channel. All you have to do is multiply 25 cents by 200 channels, and it comes to $50; meanwhile, if you buy the package, it's $12.95," Effros said.

But Williams said that point is invalid because given the choice, most consumers would choose only a few channels, not a cable or satellite radio company's entire lineup. "Consumers shouldn't be asked to subsidize what other people want. That argument just doesn't make any sense to me," he said.

The cable industry has been criticized for forcing consumers to buy channel packages instead of letting them pick from a menu for years. The debate heated up after Justin Timberlake's and Janet Jackson's 2004 Super Bowl "wardrobe malfunction," which caused Federal Communications Commission chairman Kevin Martin to push for a-la-carte options as a way to keep explicit images away from children.

Cable companies argue that a la carte would force higher prices and limit choice.

Networks charge cable companies a per-subscriber fee to carry their signals, and the cable companies spread those fees out among their subscribers by packaging channels together in tiers. If consumers could pick which channels to buy, cable companies argue, every subscriber would have to pay full price for them.

In the case of popular networks like ESPN, that could mean paying $15 per month or more for one station, compared with getting that channel as part of a $50-per-month package that included dozens of others. Beyond that, niche channels would have fewer subscribers and wouldn't make enough money to keep operating.

Josh Martin, a media and entertainment analyst with the Yankee Group, a Boston consultancy, said the cable companies have a valid point regarding their economic models.

But he also noted that the underlying economics in cable had never been challenged by another pricing model, because the industry has generally regarded offering more choice as too cumbersome for itself and its customers.

"Is it the best way? I don't know, but that's the way it's always been," Martin said.

"Plus, I don't know how consumers would respond to an a-la-carte cable service. If you start saying you can get your basic channels and you can pick and choose from this menu, I think the paperwork and the application process would be too confusing."

Keith Reed can be reached at reed@globe.com.